<\/p>\n
Dans cet article, Sam Williams expose la premi\u00e8re partie de sa critique de l’article de Michael Heinrich paru dans la Monthly Review paru en 2013. Il y amorce une critique plus globale de la contribution de Michael Heinrich.<\/em><\/p>\n The April 2013 edition of Monthly Review published an article entitled \u201cCrisis Theory, the Law of the Tendency of the Profit Rate to Fall, and Marx\u2019s Studies in the 1870s<\/a>\u201d by German Marxist Michael Heinrich. This is the same issue that published John Bellamy Foster\u2019s \u201cMarx, Kalecki, and Socialist Strategy,\u201d which I examined<\/a> the month before last.<\/p>\n Michael Heinrich teaches economics in Berlin and is the managing editor of \u201cPROKLA A Journal for Critical Science.\u201d His \u201cnew reading\u201d of Marx apparently dominates the study of Marx in German universities.<\/p>\n The publication of Heinrich\u2019s article brought about a wave of criticisms on the Internet from Marxists such as Michael Roberts who base their crisis theory precisely on Marx\u2019s law of the \u201ctendency of the rate of profit to fall,\u201d or TRPF for short.<\/p>\n Lire la suite<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Dans cet article, Sam Williams expose la premi\u00e8re partie de sa critique de l’article de Michael Heinrich paru dans la Monthly Review paru en 2013. Il y amorce une critique plus globale de la contribution de Michael Heinrich. Michael … Continuer la lecture Michael Heinrich\u2019s \u2018New Reading\u2019 of Marx\u2014A Critique, Pt\u00a01<\/h2>\n